The strategy in Afghanistan–it’s time to go–not surge.

Posted on Updated on


Afghanistan is frozen in time. And it’s not going to thaw anytime soon.

Most parts of Afghanistan resemble Star Wars’ Tattooine, specifically the Cantina at Mos Eisley Spaceport, as described by Obi Wan: “A wretched hive of scum and villainy.”

Even in the larger cities in Afghanistan, such as Kandahar, only 5 % of the populace have running water or access to the power grid.

In the context of anti-terrorism and counter-insurgency operations, the time-table for nation building does not fit. For now, the option is to kill terrorists. Every counter-insurgency is different, because they occur in different cultures. Afghanistan is not Iraq, and the tactics used are different, even if only in subtle ways.

While we will not change Afghanistan, we can prevent it from becoming a terrorist hive. Polls show that the populace has no desire to see the Taliban back in power. But the Afgani tribes are notoriously sycophantic. The day that the Taliban is viewed as having more power than the Afgan Security Forces is the day those polls will change. Afghanis want to be on the winning side.

The best option may be to remove most of our troops from Afghanistan, pulling a small contingent of Special Ops forces back to Baghram Airforce Base. From there, US and Coalition forces can strike quickly at any growing threat while monitoring and killing insurgents moving out of the Pakistani mountains. Armed drones will be of prime value and will also lower the risk of US casualties.

Armed drones, such as this Hellfire missile capable Reaper, can form the backbone of anti-Taliban actions
Armed drones, such as this Hellfire missile capable Reaper, can form the backbone of anti-Taliban actions

For now, the US’s stance should probably be one of containment, not change. It will require constant vigilance–and a willingness to kill terrorists.

Advertisements

One thought on “The strategy in Afghanistan–it’s time to go–not surge.

    McCain and I disagree on means. « Soldier-Citizen said:
    March 19, 2009 at 5:05 pm

    […] article to the Washington Post, they state that a “middle-ground” strategy such as the one that I proposed must be rejected, and that Obama’s 17,000 troop surge is a good start to what we must do in […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s