Assange: 4th Generation Enemy

Posted on


Recently, the question has arisen as to if Julian Assange of Wikileaks fame is a terrorist. In truth, this semantic issue is only important to the lawyers who may, in the future, find themselves either defending or prosecuting individuals who use cyber-attacks to deny service, or spread confidential or secret information.
 
The actions of Julian Assange are an expression of 4th Generation Warfare, a term coined by William Lind. For those not familiar, Lind classified war into 4 generations as follows:
 
Gen. 1) Line and column, Napoleonic warfare
Gen. 2) Dependence on firepower and linear attack and defence; WW1
Gen. 3) Mobility used to attack weak points in the enemy’s rear ie Blitzkrieg, Desert Storm etc.
Gen. 4) Non-linear, guerilla warfare, non-massed attacks, using a full spectrum concept of  political attacks, undermining cultural legitimacy, deception, terror, and cyber-attacks etc.
 
Because of the immense power of state military structures, the 4th generation fighter seeks every loophole available, in the true concept of Sun Tzu. Legal loopholes are exploited, the media is fully employed as a weapon for shaping the enemy and friendly population’s opinion.
 
Some argue that the generation classifications of warfare are themselves, mere semantics. That guerillas have always exploited the weaknesses of behemothic state war machines. This is true of course, but we are not only talking about guerilla warfare. What we are witnessing is a concerted effort to use our very strengths against us. Our laws, technology, openness to outside points of view and freedom have now become a sword in the hands of our enemies.
 
Despite our cynicism about government, the state finds itself bound more by laws than the non-state actor. Combining the delegitimizing of the state; technological advances which have catapulted the potential of the individual to previously undreamt of levels; the 24 hour news cycle; and the collapse of the bi-polar, Cold War, world, the 4th generation of warfare will be cause for trouble and concern for decades to come.
 
The 4th generation of warfare blurs the line between politics, crime and war. That is why there is so much talk about these issues now. Terrorism and cyber-attacks not only damage our system, they call into question the very ethos upon which our system is built. Witness the legal aspects of terror detainees, trial locations for those captured in the War on Terror, the moral and legal uncertainties of drone attacks in Pakistan.
 
We must come to the realization that our enemies are attacking our weaknesses, not our strengths. We are held captive, much as the British were in the American Revolution, by archaic and mythological honorable forms of war. We hope that Rule of Law can control the primeval passions of stateless idealogues and that static legislation can cup the liquid nature of intelligent enemies.  
Our enemies read and know Sun Tzu. Our leaders read the results of recent polling.
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Assange: 4th Generation Enemy

    Royce said:
    December 9, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    A very frightening post but unfortunately one with which I agree. I am constantly being lectured on it is necessary for America to maintain the moral high ground and not sink the level of our adversaries. I am told that Bush’s agreement to water boarding was a war crime. That even though our adversaries kill and torture captives we sholdn’t do that. The reality is that these terrorists rely on our freedoms and moral compass to allow them freedom of motion. This insanity of prosecuting these people in civilian courts is so stupid as to be unbelievable — witness one conviction out of 240+ charges. I think a few public beheadings, emasculations, and summary executions would certainly dampen some of the enthusiasm. At the very least some charges of sedition and a few deportations of these jihadist Imams would help. I realize these recommendations are not “the American Way” but as we stand today the American Way has become a weapon in the hands of our enemies.

    Amos Volante said:
    December 10, 2010 at 4:55 am

    Moral high ground: Yes, but…

    The redcoats died at the hands of a versatile colonial warrior in spite of their superior army: They were inflexible.

    When you get right down to it: The culture which has the will and wile to exist will exist. The culture which loses that will eventually ceases to exist.

    The question is: Are we that culture destined to be extinct?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s