Professor Louis Michael Seidman proposes The Collapse of the Republic

Posted on Updated on


“[A Constitution is] not an act of government but of a people constituting a government and a government without a constitution is a power without right…”Thomas Paine

The strength of America used to be its people.  Now America’s strength is geography. If the French Third Republic was surrounded by two massive oceans, it, too, may still exist. Instead, the Third Republic was pulverized by a more vital foe, in the form of the German Third Reich. France tried to fortify its own geography when it built the Maginot Line. So dilapidated  was France’s will to exist, so stunted its creativity, the Republic’s military could not see the simple solution to defeating the Maginot defenses: Go around it, through Belgium.

Contrary to popular myth, France did not have a weak military. In fact, it was the strongest in Europe, at least on paper.  Though German tanks like the Tiger and Panther are the most talked about tanks of WWII, those tanks were relatively rare and did not exist until near the end of the war. France’s intellectual and spiritual dynamism had been gutted after WWI. Just as in modern America, the Left and Right in France became bitter enemies. France’s Right, much like America’s, ( and my own beliefs), believed that the left had lead France into decadence, and the depression of the 1930s fed the country’s cynicism. Sound familiar? Corruption had infected the political, judicial and media systems, culminating in the Dreyfus Affair. The far Right was severely damaged by the event, and the Left surged.

France had no interest in war with Germany. But as Trotsky chimed, war had interest in France.   Germany annexed Czechoslovakia and France turned a blind eye, eagerly signing the Munich Agreement in a fruitless attempt to appease Hitler. The rest is history. The once proud French Republic bowed pitifully.

In 1918, France forced the Second Reich to sign an armistice and build a monument which read:

HERE ON THE ELEVENTH OF NOVEMBER 1918 SUCCUMBED THE CRIMINAL PRIDE OF THE GERMAN REICH. VANQUISHED BY THE FREE PEOPLES WHICH IT TRIED TO ENSLAVE.

Reich Triomphe: A German Soldat guards a French monument which mocked Germany’s defeat in WWI.

Now the tables were turned.  Evil won. Evil can be more energized than a sedated “good”which violates the Boy Scout Oath: Always Be Prepared. Lazy and sedated is not really good, after all.

I’m going somewhere with this. It’s not about Hitler, The Third Reich, or France; it’s about us.  I’ve just taken the long route, as I’m prone to do. My point is that a country’s fate can change very rapidly, especially when internal elites want it to change. The impetus for this article is this piece written by Louis Michael Seidman, published in the New York Times. Seidman is a Constitutional Law professor at Georgetown University. In his op-ed, Seidman contends, essentially, that the United States Constitution should be followed at our leisure, when it is convenient. He defends his position by saying that even some of the Founding Fathers defied the Constitution when they felt it fit, and that currently we spend too much time trying to divine what we thought the Founding Fathers would do instead of just doing what we feel is right.

First off, Seidman comes across as dishonest when he says:

As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is.

His article hardly carries the tone of someone who’s had a recent epiphany on the matter.

Secondly, Seidman is plain wrong. He begins his article with:

AS the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.

What provision in the Constitution has caused our government to continuously spend more money than it has? Is it the same provision that the Greek Constitution had when Greece spent itself into irrelevance?

I begin to wonder how such a shallow thinker, whom could write the following, could manage a law degree, let alone hold a respected post at an even more respected school:

 Nor, finally, should we have an all-powerful president free to do whatever he wants. Even without constitutional fealty, the president would still be checked by Congress and by the states.

Where does Seidman think that such “checks” would come from other than a Constitution?

Seidman’s most disturbing statement is thus:

Freedom of speech and religion, equal protection of the laws and protections against governmental deprivation of life, liberty or property are important, whether or not they are in the Constitution. We should continue to follow those requirements out of respect, not obligation.

So the logic is as follows: When future leaders stop respecting speech and religion, they should be able to abolish the free practice of both by fiat. 

Of course, even a Constitution is no guarantee against tyranny. I remember when I was in college, arguing in open class with my Constitutional Law professor, a lawyer, that the Constitution was merely a piece of paper, and that there was nothing special in its words that could compel all men to obey it. She grew furious, eventually storming out of the class and slamming the door. The class was silent for a few minutes, before, finally, two other students said: “I agree with you.”

The professor missed my point, I think, which was not that government and people should do as they please, without regard to the Constitution, but that, as I’ve written recently, nothing absolutely compels them to obey the law except force. Otherwise, the Constitution is a gentleman’s agreement in a world where not everyone is a gentleman.

In David Berlinski’s brilliant book, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions, Berlinski writes the following:

At some time after it became clear that Nazi Germany would lose the Second World War, and before the war had actually been lost, one of the senior party officers–perhaps it was Himmler–in confronting the very complicated series of treaty organizations that Germany had accepted with respect to its satraps, wondered out loud, “What, after all, compels us to keep our promises?” It is a troubling question  and one that illustrates anew the remarkable genius for moral philosophy the Nazis enjoyed.

What does? 

Seidman seems to enjoy the fact that nothing can compel a president to obey a law and thus believes we should remove the outdated shackles of the Constitution from the Executive branch. He proposes checks, but does not indicate from where these checks would draw their power. While it is true that the Constitution probably has faults ( as all human creations must) its brilliance is in its generality, which allows for some flexibility. The Constitution is supposed to be difficult to change, like any work of importance. It can be changed. By amendment…

Moreover, a Constitution, even a flawed one, keeps important ideals highlighted in the mind of a people. It draws a people together, and makes a nation, not just a state. It says, we’re in this thing together and we’ll do our best to make it happen. The Constitution is the glue that keeps our parts from flying into the ether and our people from degrading to tribal warfare.

As it says:

We the People  of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I shy from arguments which summon Hitler. Mostly such arguments seek to shock hearers into agreement. I do not seek this. Well, not only this.  Instead, I present the empirical. Hitler, democratically elected, consolidated all powers of the State in the federal government by disintegrating the parliament and he was made Fuhrer.

Many people  never dreamed a life-failure like Adolph Hitler could do what he did. A mere corporal in the German Army in WWI, a failure in school, in art, in relationships, a convict. And yet, as Hitler bragged to a British correspondent in Berlin, 1934:

At the risk of appearing to talk nonsense I tell you that the National Socialist movement will go on for 1,000 years! … Don’t forget how people laughed at me 15 years ago when I declared that one day I would govern Germany. They laugh now, just as foolishly, when I declare that I shall remain in power!

There’s quite a few now who think it could never happen again. Unlikely? Sure. Impossible? Never. There have always been experts. The French Third Republic and Germany, both the pinnacle of Western civilization in the 30s, were filled with experts who believes these things could never happen. Many of them also spoke and wrote just as Seidman does now. That men will do the right thing out of respect…

As the French Third Republic shows us, a country can go from military supremacy to signing an armistice in defeat, in a flash, and small-minded but energized men can wreck a nation. Our country is lucky, given its present state, that it has two oceans to guard it, and not a rock wall. That we have Canada to our north and not the Third Reich. Our Constitution has served us as no Constitution has ever served a nation, making America the light on the hill. We should jealously guard it, even with our own blood if need be. It should be changed only with solemn consideration and amendment.

So now I leave you with the oath I swore 4 years ago, and plan to carry to whatever end it brings me. I hope my people will follow:

I, Douglas Moore, do solemnly swear  that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Professor Louis Michael Seidman proposes The Collapse of the Republic

    ajmacdonaldjr said:
    January 3, 2013 at 1:12 am

    Sad to say, the US Constitution has been, legally speaking a dead letter for quite some time, meaning it’s no longer convenient, as you point out, to follow it. No more the objective standard with a meaning plain and obvious to all, it’s now open to interpretation, just as Rumsfeld said the Geneva Conventions were, during the Iraq fiasco. I hope and pray America can be restored to her constitutional authority, as she was intended to be. There are many peoples such as yourself and I who desire this as well, including a very good friend of mine who is an Iraq veteran and a police officer as well. It will be up to people like us to fix America and to take her back as soon as possible. Please check out the movement we are organizing to do this, which is up and running now, but has a long ways still to go. See: http://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/philosophy-and-plan-of-action-summer-of-justice-2012-dc/

    Brendan Doran said:
    January 3, 2013 at 2:42 am

    Pretty trenchant analysis. I missed the faux sudden epiphany. My comments elsewhere were that this did not appear on the NYT Editorial page by a copy boy error, but by design. I also remarked they better get their own _____ Army. For that matter police.

    I wonder what Lawyer thinks he’s going to be Dictator. Their self referential world has entered delusion. It may well have been an enormous error to make what is common sentiment a public policy debate. Because the point of the article was to “start a conversation.”

    ajmacdonaldjr said:
    January 3, 2013 at 5:42 pm

    The Times has run some interesting stories of late. Have you seen this one concerning NSA’s Stellar Wind, which was pointed at the American people beginning September 2001? The Times is doing this because it’s attempting to deflect DoD’s claim that Israeli Mossad alone perpetrated 9/11 by casting blame on the USG alone. The truth is both DoD and Mossad were involved, with Mossad executing the NYC job with DoD’s help regarding the NORAD stand down. The CIA is, of course, involved in the entire operation and has been Zionist controlled since the take over when Bill Colby was ousted, then drowned shortly afterward in the Potomac. The Patraeus incident occurred after Zionist Romney’s loss in November necessitated an immediate smear campaign to oust DoD control from CIA which Obama was attempting to instigate. Obama himself was threatened, in print, by the editor of the Atlanta Jewish Times last January, saying Mossad may need to assassinate any US president – namely Obama – who did not cooperate 100% with Israel, which Obama never has, telling them to return to the 1967 borders, which is not at all what they want to hear. Obama is a traitor as are the rest of the elected USG officials and their media lapdogs are, but he is at least “Israel-light” when compared to Ziophile Romney. There is and has been a war ongoing within the US military and intelligence agencies as well as the Congress for many years now, which is now come to a head. Patraeus was a part of a small group of generals planning a coup d’ etat which will, sooner of later, take place in order for DoD to be rid of Zionist influence once and for all.

    See: Stellar Wind: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/the-national-security-agencys-domestic-spying-program.html

    See: Obama assassination: http://gawker.com/5877892/

    See: Two waring factions: http://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2012/09/08/there-are-two-factions-waring-within-the-us-intelligence-services-and-the-pentagon/

    See: White House fears coup d’ etat and instigates purge See: 41:00 – 43:00 here: http://rss.infowars.com/20121122_Thu_Alex.mp3

    “America wanted solutions and democratically elected government wasn’t providing them. The country suffered from a “deep pessimism about politicians and government after years of broken promises.” David Finkle observed in the Washington Post Magazine that for most Americans “the perception of government is that it has evolved from something that provides democracy’s framework into something that provides obstacles, from some- thing to celebrate into something to ignore.” Likewise, politicians and their proposals seemed stale and repetitive. Millions of voters gave up hope of finding answers. The “environment of apathy” Janos characterized as a precursor to a coup had arrived.” ~ The American Military Coup of 2012

    See: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/Articles/2010winter/Dunlap_Jr.pdf

    T. J. Babson said:
    January 20, 2013 at 5:22 am

    America was blessed at its founding because the Founders were not only extraordinarily good and decent people, but were astute observers of the human condition.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s